Saturday, April 21, 2012

Review: Charleston Symphony tackles Mahler


The sheer numbers were impressive. It’s not often you get to see the Gaillard stage filled edge to edge and feel the wide-open hall vibrate with such a big sound.
Leave it to Gustav Mahler to write a symphony that requires two sets of timpani, two harps, four trombones, eight trumpets, nine horns, robust winds and percussion and nearly 50 strings. Oh, and did I mention the organ? The off-stage brass? The two solo singers? The huge chorus?
The occasion was Mahler’s Symphony No. 2 in C minor, the “Resurrection,” featuring a confident Daniel Hege on the podium, soprano Jill Terhaar Lewis, mezzo-soprano Jennifer Luiken, the CSO Chorus and the College of Charleston Concert Choir prepared by Rob Taylor. It was courageous (both musically and logistically) of the recently resurrected Charleston Symphony, with its core of 24, to tackle this monster, and I confess I was a little worried that a freshly assembled ensemble consisting of many musicians who don’t play together consistently would fail to make the music gel and pack Mahler’s requisite emotional punch.
Well, the team pulled it off.
Mahler’s 10 symphonies are big, complex expressions of innocence and experience, alternating between childlike folk tunes expressing happy nostalgia and profound laments informed by the heart-rending angst of a composer torn between identities.
Mahler, born a Jew, converted to Catholicism, though had to contend with explicit anti-Semitism. He married the beautiful young socialite Alma Schindler who would bear him two daughters, one of whom, Maria, would die young of scarlet fever. But Alma was not the stay-at-home type, and she began an affair with the architect Walter Gropius.
Having gained a great reputation as a conductor of opera and symphonic music, Mahler would struggle to find time to compose. He loved the voice but never wrote an opera himself, preferring to meld voices — solo and chorus — into the textures of his enormous concert works.
What’s more, his music, informed both by the Germanic tradition and by Eastern Europe’s folk tradition, was the last to fully embrace the post-Romantic style. He was a man on the cusp of the era of modern music who nevertheless could not resist looking over his shoulder at a dying tradition.
Saturday’s concert began with an allegro maestoso featuring lots of give and take between strings and brass, with the winds and percussion adding their critical textures. It felt a little like the musicians were being reacquainted with one another after rehearsals. They were perhaps too worried about playing the notes on the page and keeping things together (which they did rather well) to permit themselves to delve into the contradictory significance of the music.
But then they let go. The andante, which had a chamber music feel, was a charmer, full of pluck (literally) and grace. Hege set down the baton and conducted with his bare hands, which lent a welcomed immediacy to the proceedings.
The third movement, “In quietly flowing motion,” was an evocative, sometimes tempestuous ride featuring Mahler’s typical mood swings, lilting melodies and bold bursts of brass.
Luiken sang her Urlicht (“Primal Light”) gorgeously, those Romantic lines soaring to the heavens. And the finale, a scherzo of the apocalyptic kind, showed off the chorus and soloists to beautiful effect. An admirable finesse and glow dominated, along with pain and longing, culminating in bursts of blissful exuberance.
Lewis lent gravitas to the large vocal sections with chorus, her lyrical voice emerging from the textures effortlessly.
The choristers waited patiently for the fifth movement to sing, then began with a shimmering “aufersteh’n,” “rise again!” It grew from there. “You were not born for nothing!” … “In love’s fierce striving I shall soar upwards.” … “That for which you suffered, to God will it lead you!”
Mahler suffered. He suffered from the loss of a child and the abandonment of a wife. He suffered from insult and betrayal. He also succeeded, becoming one of the most respected conductors of his time.
The music he managed to write — mostly symphonies and songs — is imbued with all the angst and disappointment, love and longing, he could muster.
It is music from an era when the heart seemed always ready to burst, when a new world order loomed in the near distance and when a European composer often had something big and important to say.
The Charleston Symphony on Saturday made its statement, conveying Mahler’s whimsy and sorrow with a command unusual for a regional orchestra.
Leaving the Gaillard after that splendid concert, as the drizzle began to coat the ground, one felt — dare I say it? — reborn.

No comments: