September 11, 2012
BY ADAM PARKER
aparker@postandcourier.com
In many ways, it’s just another
day. Bob Dylan’s new CD is out. It’s Toddler Tuesday at the Charles Town
Landing State Historic Site. The employed are on the job. Construction workers
frame and roof. Gardeners trim and clean. Teachers explain. Chefs cook.
But this is not a regular day
at all, of course. This is the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks that punctured America’s naiveté and reasserted that terrible
us-versus-them paradigm, a day that explicitly named a new enemy and signaled
the start of two new wars.
Nearly 3,000 people died that
bright Tuesday morning as a result of Al-Qaeda’s airplane hijackings. As a
result of the subsequent war in Iraq, 4,400 U.S. servicemen and women were
killed and 32,000 were injured. Civilian deaths almost certainly exceed
100,000, according to multiple sources (and possibly surpass 600,000, a Lancet
survey asserts).
In Afghanistan so far, more
than 1,800 U.S. forces have been killed and about 10,000 wounded. Perhaps
70,000 civilians have died during the course of the U.S.-led actions there.
To say the 9/11 attacks changed
America is an understatement.
Yet even as the wars were in
their early years and the trauma of the lost towers still raw, Americans were
told to keep shopping, to resist the temptation to hate, to maintain their
values and faith. The government will do its work, the message went, the rest
of us should forge ahead as if it were Sept. 10.
Eleven years later, we are over
the hump of the big milestone anniversary and a new generation has come of age,
young people who were children at the time and unable to grasp the full
implications of the attacks.
The magnificent 9/11 memorial
at Ground Zero is completed. The 104-story tower called One World Trade Center
is nearly finished. The wound has been replaced by scar tissue, and the scar
tissue is beginning to soften a little.
Some of us still find it
impossible to look at certain images. I was a witness to the day, living in New
York City and watching with dismay as the yellow haze floated through my
Brooklyn neighborhood, sending down a drizzle of fire-singed file papers. I
cannot bear the sight of that infamous photograph of the fireball bursting
through the center of the South Tower.
But my daughter, who was not
yet 2 years old on that day, being pushed in her stroller through the haze and
ash, understands 9/11 differently.
And the people outside of New
York City — and far from Washington D.C., Arlington, Va., and the area around
Shanksville, Penn. — who watched the horror unfold on television were affected
in another way. Their children, in turn, reacted in accordance with their age
and context. Perspectives change with generational and geographical distance.
The 9/11 attacks served to
unite Americans for a time, but then old rivalries — divergent political and
religious ideologies, social priorities and economic imperatives — began to
find their way back into public discourse. Soon, the status quo asserted
itself. Innocence might have been lost, and perhaps a certain confidence, but
not much else.
This dynamic, though, is not
unusual. This is the adjustment we make. This is what happens after national
trauma.
Today, who can recall the anger
and anguish that gripped the country after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor?
Who remembers precisely where you were and what you were doing — and how you
felt — when President John Kennedy was assassinated?
“It’s kind of like grief, isn’t
it?” said Von Bakanic, a sociology professor at the College of Charleston. “You
have to live.”
And so Americans today think
about this anniversary, or don’t think about it. They go on living. They
fulfill their obligations. They do their shopping. They shuttle their kids
around town. They watch a movie.
And some keep searching for
answers.
What of the dead? How do we
memorialize them now, with fanfare or quiet prayer? With a contemplative
pilgrimage or bittersweet toast among company?
And what of this so-called War
on Terror? What can we do to help American soldiers? What can we do to prevent
the next assault? What must we do to change the world?
Christine Grenier, a math tutor
in town, said she’s often upset by the way people respond on the anniversary.
They try to show their compassion, but the event was overwhelming, and any
reaction, no matter how sincere, strikes her as inadequate.
“I feel like it’s a bigger loss
than I can comprehend, and I don’t want to disrespect it,” Grenier said.
She was in New York at the
beginning of 2002, teaching at the St. Ignatius Loyola School on the Upper East
Side. Six of her students had lost a parent in the attacks. She was friendly
with one of the widows, and taken aback when the woman, only months after her
loss, danced with abandonment at a school event.
And there was the man, the
father of one of her students, who survived the attacks because he was late for
work but lost many of his friends and colleagues. Guilt and stress and anger
consumed him in the weeks that followed.
These are people who found a
way to endure. But how?
“There’s something there that’s
too good for me,” Grenier said.
The Rev. Bert Keller was in his office at the Medical University the day of the attacks. A secretary with access to a small
television told him something really big was happening and he
ought to have a look. Keller, like so many others, remained glued to the TV all
day. He had visited the Twin Towers some years before and worried that the casualty
rate would reach in the tens of thousands, he said. “It was a horrific kind of
thing.”
And the horror was exacerbated
by the response.
“We immediately got off on
wrong foot,” Keller said. “This was an opportunity for national self-examination
and reaching out for healing, and instead it became a time of vengeance and
unbridled anger that led us into irrational and extremely costly avenues of
action that we should never have taken. And that really did condition a lot the
way I feel about the day.”
Brady Anderson, a Charleston
resident and former Clinton Administration official, was visiting his daughter
in Greensboro, N.C., holding his newborn granddaughter in his arms, when the
planes struck. He said the date “9/11” sticks with us because of its symbolic
importance.
“It’s shorthand for something
to Americans that’s at the same time very, very bad — and even evil — but that
also symbolizes how we view ourselves. Something really bad happens and we
bounce back. I think it has both pieces to it. It’s not just a negative.”
The date also is significant
because it marked the moment Americans woke up to the dangers of terrorism and
realized the nation’s vulnerability, Anderson said. And it led to changes that
have made the U.S. more secure.
“Defeat turns into victory, in
a way,” he said. “Whatever they tried to do on 9/11 they didn’t do.”
So the 11th anniversary is upon
us, in an election year, at a time the nation is badly divided on ideological
grounds, when “truth” is not always the sum of the facts and the common good is
often lost among the rhetoric.
For me, 9/11 carries a special
significance: I will always remember the solidarity that encompassed my city,
the fellowship that ensued, the outpouring of collective anguish and
consolation. I will remember that better than the partisan acrimony that
followed. I will find some comfort in it, and some small hope that a shared
determination to manage and overcome hardship may one day characterize America
again. For a nation can thrive only when its citizens find a common purpose.
Others will consider this day
differently. They will find comfort in their own way. And future generations
will learn what we teach them about Sept. 11, and they will mark the day with
public events and private remembrances. They will look back into history and
reach their conclusions.
“What does the day mean?”
Bakanic asked. “I guess it means as many things as there are individuals who
experienced it.”
Reach Adam
Parker at 937-5902. Follow him at www.facebook.com/aparkerwriter.
No comments:
Post a Comment